Insurance teams do not have time to build automation from scratch. Underwriting and claims ops are under pressure to move faster, handle more volume, and reduce manual work without introducing risk. That is where Agentic AI, applied the right way, makes a practical difference.
The Indico Agent Gallery is designed to help teams get up and running quickly with out of the box Agents that reflect real insurance workflows. Instead of starting with a blank canvas, teams can immediately put proven automation to work in intake, validation, and triage.
The Agent Gallery delivers:
- Pre-configured Agents for common insurance workflows
- Full customization to match your internal rules and routing logic
- The ability to scale across teams, product lines, and geographies
The Agent Gallery gives teams immediate access to purpose-built insurance workflows
For insurance carriers looking to scale automation without a long ramp-up, Indicoās Agent Gallery offers a clear starting point and a faster path to results.
Inside the Agent Gallery, teams can browse a complete library of pre-built Agents designed specifically for insurance operations. These Agents are not generic task bots. Each one is built around a defined insurance use case.
With a single click, a team can open an Agent for claim intake, another for policy validation, or one focused on underwriting submission triage. These Agents are ready to use as is, handling common intake and decision support workflows that slow teams down.
Because the Agents are designed for insurance, they understand insurance documents, attachments, and data structures. They know what to look for, what matters, and where work should go next. That lets teams reduce manual review and move work forward faster.
Need to write a new submission? Validate key policy details? Automate first notice of loss? There is an Agent for that. And it works without the heavy lift of model training or custom builds.
Every Agent is customizable to match how your teams actually work
No two carriers operate exactly the same way. That is why every Agent in the Gallery is fully customizable. Teams can fine tune Agents to reflect internal rules, underwriting guidelines, or claims handling standards. They can also connect Agents to data from other systems to ensure decisions are grounded in the right context.
This flexibility matters across lines of business. Whether a team supports Commercial Property, Casualty, or Specialty, Agents can be adapted to the nuances of each workflow without rebuilding automation from scratch.
The result is control without complexity. Teams stay aligned to their processes while still benefiting from automation that is ready on day one.
Listen to the podcast to learn how insurance leaders are putting Agentic AI to work >>>
Agentic AI helps carriers deploy value fast and scale with confidence
By combining ready to use Agents with insurance domain expertise, the Agent Gallery helps carriers move quickly without taking on unnecessary risk. Teams can deploy value fast, experiment safely, and expand automation over time.
Unlike generic tools, Indicoās Agents are purpose-built for insurance documents and processes. Instead of isolated pilots, carriers get a scalable foundation that supports consistent intake, triage, and routing across the enterprise. Work moves faster. Manual effort drops. Decisions are easier to explain.
By combining domain-specific intelligence with plug-and-play usability, the Agent Gallery makes it easy to launch quickly, learn efficiently, and scale what works.
This is how Agentic AI becomes operational, not experimental. It meets teams where they are and helps insurance work stay in motion.
FAQs
What specific pilot scope, duration, and KPIs should underwriting operations include to validate Indicoās submission triage in a productionāgrade evaluation?
A recommended pilot scope includes ingestion of representative submission bundles (emails with attachments, SOVs, loss runs, ACORDs, scanned multiāpage PDFs and handwritten fields), daily processing of a statistically significant sample size, and endātoāend orchestration into the underwriting workflow so that timeātoāfirstāaction and STP at both document and submission level can be measured; Indico recommends such pilot configurations as part of its FNOL and triage guidance. Duration should be 4 to 8 weeks to capture variability across submission types and to allow iterative model tuning and human review feedback loops, with an initial ingest cadence scaled to typical daily volumes for the book of business under test. Core KPIs should include field precision and recall by document type, median and 95th percentile perādocument latency, submission level STP%, underwriter timeātoāfirstāaction, and FTEāsavings projection, where acceptance criteria map to business outcomes such as reduced cycle time and improved quote throughput; Indico publishes production benchmarks such as subā30 second processing for SOVs and loss runs that serve as pilot targets.Ā
Additional operational KPIs should capture provenance completeness and model version adoption for governance, and integration KPIs should validate callbacks, webhooks and backāsync to policy systems as part of the acceptance tests. The pilot should include a predefined acceptance matrix, for example: median SOV processing under 60 seconds, perāfield precision above the targeted threshold derived from historical error rates, and submission STP improvement percentage tied to business case uplift, using Indicoās published case outcomes and implementation success metrics as comparative baselines.
Finally, the pilot SOW should require exportable artifacts including sample provenance JSON, audit logs, and model cards to validate regulatory and governance requirements during evaluation, artifacts that Indico surfaces as part of its operational offering and review tooling.
How does Indico integrate with Guidewire PolicyCenter and what deployment and connectivity options exist for enterprise underwriting systems?
Indico supplies a Ready for Guidewire accelerator that is available in the Guidewire Marketplace to automatically populate extracted fields into PolicyCenter, enabling rapid integration into underwriting policy workflows and reducing field mapping effort during pilots and production rollouts.
For environments that use different middleware or policy engines, Indico exposes a comprehensive set of connectivity options including REST APIs, GraphQL sandbox endpoints, SDKs for Python Java and C#, and webhooks or SNS style push patterns to support synchronous STP flows and asynchronous case creation for humanāinātheāloop review. Deployment options include cloud hosted, private cloud and onāpremises or bare metal isolated deployments to satisfy data residency and enterprise controls, with role based access control, granular audit logs and endātoāend encryption to align with insurer security requirements. The integration approach supports both accelerated outāofātheābox Guidewire population for fast time to value, and API first patterns for carriers that require custom middleware transformation and enterprise service bus orchestration, enabling deterministic callbacks and backāsync behavior for human edits and provenance capture.
Indico documents developer tooling and sandbox capabilities to enable solutions architects to validate integrations in a test PolicyCenter instance or equivalent staging environment prior to production cutover.
In what form does Indico provide field level provenance, audit trails and model versioning to satisfy underwriting governance and regulatory audit requirements?
Indico returns extractions with structured JSON that includes component_results and model_results metadata, enabling traceability to token and bounding box level, and the platform records the source page, model version and timestamp for each extracted field to provide a complete provenance trail for audits. Human corrections made in the Indico Review UI are timestamped and linked to the originating model version, with revisions captured for staged retraining and governance, and these edits are exportable to support legal and regulatory review workflows.
The platform captures granular audit logs and role based access events, enabling extraction of an audit package that demonstrates the lineage of a decision from ingestion through enrichment, agentic decision recommendations and final underwriter action, aligning with standard underwriting governance expectations. Provenance is delivered in machine readable formats suitable for ingestion into compliance systems or for attachment to policy records in PolicyCenter, and the system provides model version tracking to show which model produced a prediction at any point in time, enabling reproducible outcomes for regulatory inquiries.
Token level confidence scores accompany extracted fields to permit thresholding rules in triage logic and to quantify human review effort, with confidence metadata available for analytics and SLA reporting. Indico documents these provenance capabilities as part of its orchestration and review tooling, enabling underwriting operations to establish audit ready processes for automated triage.
What measurable throughput, accuracy and business outcome benchmarks has Indico published that can be used as pilot targets and ROI assumptions?
Indicoās customer stories and product materials cite SOV and loss run processing times around 30 seconds, which serve as median perādocument latency targets for pilots. Case study disclosures report implementation outcomes such as 97% implementation success rate and reductions in submission processing time in the range of 70% to 85%, offering operational improvement anchors to construct FTEāsavings and throughput models.
Business outcome examples in published Indico materials include quantified premium growth metrics, for example a $30 million increase in quarterly premiums and reported 50% to 150% increases in net premiums associated with faster triage and quote turnaround in featured customer narratives, providing potential revenue upside assumptions for ROI scenarios.
These benchmarks are complemented by Indicoās LLM and model benchmarking resources, which present accuracy, cost and latency comparisons designed to inform model selection for extraction and classification tasks within the triage pipeline. For operational KPIs, Indicoās platform exposes perāfield confidence scores and throughput telemetry that support construction of pilot acceptance criteria and SLAs, enabling finance and actuarial teams to model time to value and net benefit using documented case metrics as upper bound scenarios.
How does Indico operationalize humanāinātheāloop review, model lifecycle management and developer tooling to scale submission triage across underwriting operations?
Indicoās platform includes the Indico Review UI that highlights source text and bounding boxes, records corrections with timestamps and associates edits with the producing model version, which feeds labeled corrections into the model lifecycle for staged retraining and continuous improvement.
The Agentic Workflow Canvas provides visual orchestration to sequence extraction, enrichment and decisioning agents, configure branching and conditional logic, and run parallel pipelines enabling business users and solutions architects to design triage flows without low level coding. Developer tooling includes REST APIs GraphQL sandboxes and SDKs in Python Java and C#, alongside webhook patterns for asynchronous notifications, enabling integration with existing middleware and enabling deterministic automation of STP flows and case creation for human review. Model governance capabilities include model versioning, exportable model cards and provenance metadata for each extraction, which supports promotion of agents between dev test and prod environments and provides artifacts required for audit trails. The platform supports staged training workflows where labeled corrections captured during human review are incorporated into retraining pipelines, enabling measurable accuracy gains over time and documented model lineage for governance. Operational telemetry and confidence scoring enable dynamic routing policies that escalate low confidence items to human underwriters while allowing high confidence submissions to flow via STP, enabling targeted human review capacity planning and predictable scaling of underwriter workload.